ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L
ECOG.L (Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) and LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECOG.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LDEG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOG.L returned 2.25%/yr vs 15.91%/yr for LDEG.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECOG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDEG.L.
Performance
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOG.L achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 9.44% return.
ECOG.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- —
LDEG.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 13.37%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- —
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOG.L Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | -1.05% | 3.54% | 4.57% | 15.08% | -12.19% | 4.41% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 9.44% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOG.L and LDEG.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between ECOG.L and LDEG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECOG.L
LDEG.L
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ECOG.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ECOG.L
LDEG.L
Technology
ECOG.L
LDEG.L
Real Estate
ECOG.L
LDEG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ECOG.L
LDEG.L
Financial Services
ECOG.L
LDEG.L
Basic Materials
ECOG.L
-
LDEG.L
Communication Services
ECOG.L
-
LDEG.L
Energy
ECOG.L
-
LDEG.L
Healthcare
ECOG.L
-
LDEG.L
Utilities
ECOG.L
-
LDEG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECOG.L
LDEG.L
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECOG.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.47 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 3.68 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 13.49 | -11.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECOG.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 2.57 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 1.23 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.22 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOG.L and LDEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOG.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -15.97% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -8.04% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -12.05% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -15.97% | -10.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -2.19% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -2.95% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 2.20% | +2.53% |
Volatility
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison
Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that ECOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOG.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 3.49% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 9.18% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 11.56% | +2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 15.99% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 16.01% | +1.04% |
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOG.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison
ECOG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOG.L Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.16% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOG.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECOG.L.
ECOG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LDEG.L is Europe Equities. ECOG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECOG.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.
Find the right allocation for ECOG.L and LDEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer