ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L
ECOG.L (Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) and CYSE.L (WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Legal & General and WisdomTree respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOG.L returned 2.51%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for CYSE.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECOG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CYSE.L.
Performance
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOG.L achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than CYSE.L's 24.45% return.
ECOG.L
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 7.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- —
CYSE.L
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 26.86%
- YTD
- 24.45%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 12.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- —
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOG.L Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.22% | 3.54% | 4.57% | 15.08% | -12.19% | 19.19% |
CYSE.L WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 24.45% | -8.72% | 13.36% | 60.49% | -36.28% | 11.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOG.L and CYSE.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ECOG.L and CYSE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECOG.L
CYSE.L
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
ECOG.L
CYSE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ECOG.L
CYSE.L
-
Technology
ECOG.L
CYSE.L
Real Estate
ECOG.L
CYSE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ECOG.L
CYSE.L
-
Financial Services
ECOG.L
CYSE.L
-
Basic Materials
ECOG.L
-
CYSE.L
-
Communication Services
ECOG.L
-
CYSE.L
-
Energy
ECOG.L
-
CYSE.L
-
Healthcare
ECOG.L
-
CYSE.L
-
Utilities
ECOG.L
-
CYSE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECOG.L
CYSE.L
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECOG.L | CYSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.38 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 0.87 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECOG.L | CYSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.37 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.34 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.24 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum CYSE.L drawdown of -46.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOG.L and CYSE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOG.L | CYSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -46.58% | +20.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -31.22% | +18.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -35.88% | +13.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -46.58% | +20.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -4.84% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -19.16% | +11.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 13.71% | -8.97% |
Volatility
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) is 3.94%, while WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc (CYSE.L) has a volatility of 13.86%. This indicates that ECOG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYSE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOG.L | CYSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 13.86% | -9.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 28.40% | -17.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 32.03% | -17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 31.30% | -14.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 31.34% | -14.29% |
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CYSE.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOG.L vs. CYSE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECOG.L nor CYSE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYSE.L WisdomTree Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
ECOG.L Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOG.L and CYSE.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CYSE.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CYSE.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECOG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECOG.L and 0.45% for CYSE.L.
Find the right allocation for ECOG.L and CYSE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer