ECO vs. SNOW
ECO (Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. ECO operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past year, ECO returned 156.80% vs 24.00% for SNOW. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ECO vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 73.56% return, which is significantly higher than SNOW's 19.19% return.
ECO
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 54.36%
- YTD
- 73.56%
- 1Y
- 156.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOW
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- YTD
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- —
ECO vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 73.56% | 71.94% | -11.70% | -1.25% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 19.19% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECO and SNOW is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
ECO:
$1.80B
SNOW:
$90.62B
ECO:
$5.73
SNOW:
-$3.53
ECO:
3.96
SNOW:
17.63
ECO:
2.89
SNOW:
43.82
ECO:
$481.57M
SNOW:
$5.03B
ECO:
$274.61M
SNOW:
$3.38B
ECO:
$284.05M
SNOW:
-$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECO vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
ECO
SNOW
ECO vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECO | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.14 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.25 | 0.39 | +8.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.78 | 0.84 | +24.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECO vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum SNOW drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECO | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.15% | -72.99% | +26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.66% | -56.30% | +38.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -34.94% | +31.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -48.89% | +34.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 26.10% | -19.77% |
Volatility
ECO vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) at 12.19%. This indicates that ECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECO | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.55% | 12.19% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.07% | 53.30% | -22.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.32% | 66.06% | -24.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.27% | 61.97% | -19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.27% | 62.49% | -20.22% |
Dividends
ECO vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, while SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 9.10% | 6.26% | 15.57% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ECO vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ECO vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison
ECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
ECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
ECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECO and SNOW have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECO has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to SNOW (12.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECO and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer