ECO vs. MRVL
ECO (Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp) and MRVL (Marvell Technology Group Ltd.) are both stocks. ECO operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while MRVL operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past year, ECO returned 139.41% vs 385.03% for MRVL. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ECO vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 50.53% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 255.40% return.
ECO
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- YTD
- 50.53%
- 6M
- 40.48%
- 1Y
- 139.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRVL
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- 84.32%
- YTD
- 255.40%
- 6M
- 201.42%
- 1Y
- 385.03%
- 3Y*
- 71.71%
- 5Y*
- 44.57%
- 10Y*
- 41.46%
ECO vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 50.53% | 71.94% | -11.70% | -1.51% |
MRVL Marvell Technology Group Ltd. | 255.40% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECO and MRVL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2023 | 0.07 |
The correlation between ECO and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ECO:
$1.82B
MRVL:
$269.46B
ECO:
$5.83
MRVL:
$2.90
ECO:
8.17
MRVL:
104.16
ECO:
0.77
MRVL:
0.19
ECO:
3.37
MRVL:
30.19
ECO:
2.51
MRVL:
14.79
ECO:
$481.57M
MRVL:
$8.72B
ECO:
$274.61M
MRVL:
$4.41B
ECO:
$284.05M
MRVL:
$4.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECO vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank
ECO
MRVL
ECO vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.67 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.94 | 14.72 | -6.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.37 | 34.27 | -10.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 5.80 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.23 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
ECO vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and MRVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.15% | -91.60% | +45.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.66% | -26.36% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -60.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.05% | 0.00% | -13.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -46.78% | +31.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.99% | 11.30% | -5.31% |
Volatility
ECO vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) is 12.23%, while Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL) has a volatility of 32.78%. This indicates that ECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.23% | 32.78% | -20.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.99% | 50.48% | -20.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.60% | 66.88% | -26.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.99% | 60.92% | -18.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.99% | 51.38% | -9.39% |
Dividends
ECO vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison
ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.49%, more than MRVL's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 10.49% | 6.26% | 15.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRVL Marvell Technology Group Ltd. | 0.08% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
Financials
ECO vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Marvell Technology Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ECO vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison
ECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
ECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
ECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECO and MRVL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (32.78%) compared to ECO (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs MRVL's -91.60%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.80 vs 3.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECO and MRVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer