ECO vs. GLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD).
GLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM. It was launched on Nov 18, 2004.
Performance
ECO vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ECO vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 53.85% | 71.94% | -11.70% | -1.51% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 8.57% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 2.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 53.85% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 8.57% return.
ECO
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- 53.85%
- 6M
- 81.60%
- 1Y
- 150.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 49.33%
- 3Y*
- 32.92%
- 5Y*
- 21.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECO vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
ECO
GLD
ECO vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.52 | 1.79 | +1.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.81 | 2.21 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.18 | 2.68 | +5.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.05 | 9.90 | +12.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 1.79 | +1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.62 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between ECO and GLD is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ECO vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 6.56% | 6.26% | 15.57% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ECO vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, roughly equal to the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and GLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.15% | -45.56% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.66% | -19.21% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.03% | -13.23% | +8.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -16.17% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 5.20% | +1.35% |
Volatility
ECO vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a higher volatility of 14.33% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 11.06%. This indicates that ECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ECO | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.33% | 11.06% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.83% | 24.30% | +5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.08% | 27.80% | +15.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.16% | 17.74% | +24.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.16% | 15.87% | +26.29% |