ECO vs. FTGC
ECO (Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp) is a stock, while FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Over the past year, ECO returned 170.04% vs 28.18% for FTGC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ECO vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 78.93% return, which is significantly higher than FTGC's 18.86% return.
ECO
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 78.93%
- 6M
- 85.73%
- 1Y
- 170.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- 18.86%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
ECO vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 78.93% | 71.94% | -11.70% | -1.25% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 18.86% | 14.61% | 9.96% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECO and FTGC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.24 |
The correlation between ECO and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECO vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
ECO
FTGC
ECO vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECO | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.32 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.69 | 2.60 | +7.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.02 | 9.67 | +18.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECO vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECO | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.15% | -59.47% | +13.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.66% | -10.87% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.87% | +10.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -27.34% | +12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 2.94% | +3.22% |
Volatility
ECO vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a higher volatility of 12.72% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 3.07%. This indicates that ECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECO | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.72% | 3.07% | +9.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.62% | 13.21% | +17.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.34% | 15.70% | +24.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.94% | 15.87% | +26.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.94% | 14.71% | +27.23% |
Dividends
ECO vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, less than FTGC's 16.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 8.83% | 6.26% | 15.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 16.13% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECO and FTGC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECO has higher volatility (12.72%) compared to FTGC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs FTGC's -59.47%.
ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECO and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer