PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECO vs. EWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECO vs. EWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 73.56% return, which is significantly higher than EWZ's 14.17% return.


ECO

1D
5.19%
1M
10.41%
6M
54.36%
YTD
73.56%
1Y
156.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EWZ

1D
2.77%
1M
4.20%
6M
9.71%
YTD
14.17%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECO vs. EWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
73.56%71.94%-11.70%-1.25%
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
14.17%48.81%-30.41%7.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ECO and EWZ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECO vs. EWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECO
ECO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

EWZ
EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECO vs. EWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECOEWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.25

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.25

1.85

+7.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.78

4.94

+20.84

ECO vs. EWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the EWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECO and EWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECO vs. EWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum EWZ drawdown of -77.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and EWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECOEWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.15%

-77.25%

+31.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.66%

-19.27%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-20.49%

+17.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-35.90%

+21.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

7.20%

-0.87%

Volatility

ECO vs. EWZ - Volatility Comparison

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) at 5.74%. This indicates that ECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECOEWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.55%

5.74%

+9.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.07%

19.70%

+11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.32%

24.98%

+16.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.27%

27.60%

+14.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.27%

33.90%

+8.37%

Dividends

ECO vs. EWZ - Dividend Comparison

ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than EWZ's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
9.10%6.26%15.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
4.07%5.19%8.91%5.66%12.59%9.87%1.71%2.54%2.89%1.71%1.81%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECO and EWZ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECO has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to EWZ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs EWZ's -77.25%.

ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECO and EWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer