PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Short Duration Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMS.DE) and iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECMS.DE achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than EFRN.DE's 0.87% return.


ECMS.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.19%
1Y
1.65%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
10Y*

EFRN.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.29%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ECMS.DE
Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Short Duration Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc
0.21%3.37%3.99%5.24%-0.54%
EFRN.DE
iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.87%2.94%4.31%3.97%0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ECMS.DE and EFRN.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECMS.DE
ECMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ECMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ECMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

EFRN.DE
EFRN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EFRN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Short Duration Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMS.DE) and iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECMS.DEEFRN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.55

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

8.25

-7.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.98

32.61

-29.63

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECMS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the EFRN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECMS.DE and EFRN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECMS.DEEFRN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.58

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.12

-0.06

Drawdowns

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.27%, smaller than the maximum EFRN.DE drawdown of -5.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECMS.DE and EFRN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECMS.DEEFRN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-5.68%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.90%

-0.31%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.90%

-0.48%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.01%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-0.33%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.08%

+0.47%

Volatility

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Short Duration Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMS.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE) at 0.34%. This indicates that ECMS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFRN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECMS.DEEFRN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.34%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

0.80%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

0.98%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.87%

0.99%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.87%

1.35%

+1.52%

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECMS.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EFRN.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ECMS.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Dividend Comparison

ECMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFRN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ECMS.DE
Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Short Duration Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFRN.DE
iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.50%2.88%4.22%2.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECMS.DE and EFRN.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EFRN.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EFRN.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ECMS.DE.

ECMS.DE tracks Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Short Duration Multi-Factor, while EFRN.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ECMS.DE and 0.10% for EFRN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECMS.DE and EFRN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer