ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE
ECLM.DE (HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF) and MVEW.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - ECLM.DE tracks the iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers while MVEW.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECLM.DE returned -0.34%/yr vs 6.47%/yr for MVEW.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECLM.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MVEW.DE.
Performance
ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECLM.DE achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.DE's 1.17% return.
ECLM.DE
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
MVEW.DE
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 0.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLM.DE HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF | 18.15% | 12.83% | -11.47% | 1.02% | -23.37% | 14.89% | 7.80% |
MVEW.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.17% | -0.99% | 17.25% | 6.27% | -5.98% | 26.26% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLM.DE and MVEW.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ECLM.DE and MVEW.DE has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ECLM.DE
MVEW.DE
ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECLM.DE | MVEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.02 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 0.10 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 0.20 | +3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECLM.DE | MVEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.06 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.62 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.63 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECLM.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.88%, which is greater than MVEW.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLM.DE and MVEW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLM.DE | MVEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.88% | -13.19% | -36.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.77% | -4.68% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.17% | -13.19% | -22.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | -13.19% | -36.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -5.75% | -10.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.19% | -3.83% | -20.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.19% | 2.27% | +7.92% |
Volatility
ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.DE) at 2.58%. This indicates that ECLM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECLM.DE | MVEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 2.58% | +3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 5.42% | +7.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.64% | 7.97% | +20.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 10.25% | +12.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 10.82% | +12.53% |
ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLM.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MVEW.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECLM.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECLM.DE nor MVEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECLM.DE and MVEW.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MVEW.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MVEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ECLM.DE.
ECLM.DE tracks iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers, while MVEW.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ECLM.DE and 0.30% for MVEW.DE.
Find the right allocation for ECLM.DE and MVEW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer