ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE
ECLM.DE (HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF) and IQQ0.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - ECLM.DE tracks the iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers while IQQ0.DE tracks the MSCI World Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECLM.DE returned -0.34%/yr vs 6.14%/yr for IQQ0.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECLM.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQQ0.DE.
Performance
ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECLM.DE achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than IQQ0.DE's 1.59% return.
ECLM.DE
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQ0.DE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- -0.28%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLM.DE HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF | 18.15% | 12.83% | -11.47% | 1.02% | -23.37% | 14.89% | 7.80% |
IQQ0.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.59% | -1.26% | 17.64% | 3.73% | -4.34% | 24.26% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLM.DE and IQQ0.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ECLM.DE and IQQ0.DE has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ECLM.DE
IQQ0.DE
ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECLM.DE | IQQ0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.00 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | -0.05 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | -0.12 | +3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECLM.DE | IQQ0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | -0.04 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.60 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.76 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECLM.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.88%, which is greater than IQQ0.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLM.DE and IQQ0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLM.DE | IQQ0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.88% | -28.65% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.77% | -5.22% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.17% | -12.82% | -23.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | -12.82% | -37.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -6.65% | -9.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.19% | -4.54% | -19.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.19% | 2.44% | +7.75% |
Volatility
ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE) at 2.53%. This indicates that ECLM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQ0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECLM.DE | IQQ0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 2.53% | +3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 5.36% | +7.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.64% | 7.78% | +20.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 10.08% | +12.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 11.62% | +11.73% |
ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLM.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQ0.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECLM.DE vs. IQQ0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECLM.DE nor IQQ0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECLM.DE and IQQ0.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQQ0.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQ0.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ECLM.DE.
ECLM.DE tracks iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers, while IQQ0.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ECLM.DE and 0.30% for IQQ0.DE.
Find the right allocation for ECLM.DE and IQQ0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer