ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE
ECLM.DE (HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF) and IBC0.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECLM.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers, while IBC0.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Diversified Multiple-Factor. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECLM.DE returned -0.34%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for IBC0.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECLM.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IBC0.DE.
Performance
ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECLM.DE achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than IBC0.DE's 9.99% return.
ECLM.DE
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
IBC0.DE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLM.DE HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF | 18.15% | 12.83% | -11.47% | 1.02% | -23.37% | 14.89% | 7.80% |
IBC0.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS ETF | 9.99% | 21.49% | 14.29% | 19.19% | -15.94% | 26.76% | 3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLM.DE and IBC0.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.68 |
The correlation between ECLM.DE and IBC0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ECLM.DE
IBC0.DE
ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBC0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECLM.DE | IBC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.56 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 9.54 | -5.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECLM.DE | IBC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.59 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.71 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.58 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECLM.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.88%, which is greater than IBC0.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLM.DE and IBC0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLM.DE | IBC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.88% | -37.22% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.77% | -7.87% | -11.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.17% | -15.28% | -20.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.88% | -24.64% | -25.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -1.53% | -14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.19% | -5.79% | -18.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.19% | 2.12% | +8.07% |
Volatility
ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers UCITS ETF (ECLM.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBC0.DE) at 4.25%. This indicates that ECLM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBC0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECLM.DE | IBC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 4.25% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 10.49% | +2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.64% | 12.68% | +15.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 14.81% | +8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 16.32% | +7.03% |
ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLM.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IBC0.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECLM.DE vs. IBC0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECLM.DE nor IBC0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECLM.DE and IBC0.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBC0.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBC0.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ECLM.DE.
ECLM.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IBC0.DE is Europe Equities. ECLM.DE tracks iClima Global Decarbonisation Enablers, while IBC0.DE tracks MSCI Europe Diversified Multiple-Factor. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ECLM.DE and 0.45% for IBC0.DE.
Find the right allocation for ECLM.DE and IBC0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer