PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECL vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECL vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECL achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -34.35% return.


ECL

1D
-0.25%
1M
6.34%
YTD
2.89%
6M
2.03%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
9.91%

PLTR

1D
-2.34%
1M
-14.74%
YTD
-34.35%
6M
-39.89%
1Y
-16.60%
3Y*
102.61%
5Y*
34.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECL vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
2.89%13.19%19.29%37.94%-37.10%9.38%9.82%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-34.35%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ECL and PLTR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.23

The correlation between ECL and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ECL:

$76.22B

PLTR:

$300.03B

EPS

ECL:

$7.40

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

ECL:

36.32

PLTR:

131.32

PEG Ratio

ECL:

1.92

PLTR:

0.76

PS Ratio

ECL:

4.65

PLTR:

57.35

PB Ratio

ECL:

7.62

PLTR:

35.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECL:

$16.45B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECL:

$7.29B

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

ECL:

$3.28B

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECL vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECL
ECL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECL vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECLPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.98

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

-0.38

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

-0.75

+0.99

ECL vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECL Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECL and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECL vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECL drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECL and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECLPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.19%

-84.62%

+37.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.09%

-43.67%

+23.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-43.67%

+23.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-79.14%

+35.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.40%

-43.67%

+31.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-40.26%

+32.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.95%

22.06%

-13.11%

Volatility

ECL vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ecolab Inc. (ECL) is 7.76%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 19.16%. This indicates that ECL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECLPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

19.16%

-11.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.03%

38.60%

-22.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.98%

51.49%

-30.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

65.59%

-41.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.02%

69.73%

-44.71%

Dividends

ECL vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

ECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
1.06%1.02%1.01%1.09%1.42%0.83%0.87%0.96%1.15%1.13%1.21%1.17%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ECL vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecolab Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.07B
1.63B
(ECL) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ECL vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ecolab Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
43.6%
86.8%
Portfolio components
ECL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.77B and revenue of 4.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

ECL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported an operating income of 622.00M and revenue of 4.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

ECL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a net income of 432.60M and revenue of 4.07B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ECL and PLTR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (19.16%) compared to ECL (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECL dropped -47.19% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

ECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECL and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer