PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECL vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECL vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECL achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ECL has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 9.91%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.47% annualized return.


ECL

1D
-0.25%
1M
6.34%
YTD
2.89%
6M
2.03%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
9.91%

ABBV

1D
2.07%
1M
8.84%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.29%
1Y
31.92%
3Y*
24.36%
5Y*
19.80%
10Y*
19.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECL vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
2.89%13.19%19.29%37.94%-37.10%9.38%13.17%32.26%11.07%15.80%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
4.43%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ECL and ABBV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between ECL and ABBV has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ECL:

$76.22B

ABBV:

$416.46B

EPS

ECL:

$7.40

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

ECL:

36.32

ABBV:

114.38

PS Ratio

ECL:

4.65

ABBV:

6.63

PB Ratio

ECL:

7.62

ABBV:

15.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

ECL:

$16.45B

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ECL:

$7.29B

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

ECL:

$3.28B

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECL vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECL
ECL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECL vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECLABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.24

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.85

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

4.11

-3.88

ECL vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECL Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECL and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECL vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECL drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, roughly equal to the maximum ABBV drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECL and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECLABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.19%

-45.09%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.09%

-17.32%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-20.74%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-21.92%

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

-45.09%

+1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.40%

-1.66%

-10.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-10.70%

+2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.95%

7.78%

+1.17%

Volatility

ECL vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ecolab Inc. (ECL) is 7.76%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that ECL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECLABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

9.26%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.03%

19.11%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.98%

25.23%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

23.12%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.02%

25.83%

-0.81%

Dividends

ECL vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

ECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than ABBV's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.87%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
1.06%1.02%1.01%1.09%1.42%0.83%0.87%0.96%1.15%1.13%1.21%1.17%

Financials

ECL vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecolab Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
4.07B
15.00B
(ECL) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ECL vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ecolab Inc. and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
43.6%
83.5%
Portfolio components
ECL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.77B and revenue of 4.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

ECL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported an operating income of 622.00M and revenue of 4.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

ECL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ecolab Inc. reported a net income of 432.60M and revenue of 4.07B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ECL and ABBV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABBV has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to ECL (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECL dropped -47.19% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECL and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer