PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECHMX vs. NPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECHMX vs. NPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund (ECHMX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECHMX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than NPV's 1.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ECHMX having a 1.42% annualized return and NPV not far ahead at 1.48%.


ECHMX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-2.17%
6M
-0.07%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
1.42%
ALL TIME*
3.21%

NPV

1D
-0.37%
1M
-6.17%
6M
-1.81%
YTD
1.08%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
-3.29%
10Y*
1.48%
ALL TIME*
4.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$813.25K$739.98K$539.84K

ECHMX vs. NPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECHMX
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund
0.50%2.64%1.45%6.36%-10.60%0.70%5.01%7.51%1.02%3.90%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
1.08%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ECHMX and NPV is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.19

The correlation between ECHMX and NPV shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECHMX vs. NPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ECHMX
ECHMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ECHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ECHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ECHMX vs. NPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund (ECHMX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECHMXNPVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.12

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

0.75

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

2.57

+4.06

ECHMX vs. NPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECHMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the NPV Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECHMX and NPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECHMX vs. NPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECHMX drawdown since its inception was -40.96%, smaller than the maximum NPV drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHMX and NPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECHMXNPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.96%

-44.25%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-6.50%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.54%

-18.29%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-44.25%

+28.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.32%

-44.25%

+27.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-20.29%

+18.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-10.21%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.89%

-0.99%

Volatility

ECHMX vs. NPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund (ECHMX) is 0.92%, while Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a volatility of 2.16%. This indicates that ECHMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECHMXNPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

2.16%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

5.14%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

7.20%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.62%

13.41%

-8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.36%

13.16%

-8.80%

ECHMX vs. NPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECHMX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than NPV's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECHMX vs. NPV - Dividend Comparison

ECHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than NPV's 7.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECHMX
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund
2.79%3.76%3.29%2.41%2.27%1.38%1.92%2.76%2.86%2.90%3.07%3.14%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.25%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECHMX and NPV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPV has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to ECHMX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECHMX dropped -40.96% vs NPV's -44.25%.

ECHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECHMX and NPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer