ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO
ECHI.TO (Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECHI.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Ninepoint, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. ECHI.TO is actively managed, while VFV.TO is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECHI.TO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.
Performance
ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECHI.TO achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 13.35% return.
ECHI.TO
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 14.06%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- 16.31%
ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ECHI.TO Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF | 14.06% | 20.01% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 13.35% | 6.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECHI.TO and VFV.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ECHI.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFV.TO
ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECHI.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECHI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHI.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECHI.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -27.43% | +20.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.25% | -0.02% | -3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -3.35% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility
ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECHI.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 11.93% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 15.01% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 16.61% | +1.17% |
ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECHI.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECHI.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ECHI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, more than VFV.TO's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECHI.TO Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF | 11.16% | 5.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.82% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECHI.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for ECHI.TO.
ECHI.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for ECHI.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ECHI.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer