PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECHI.TO vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECHI.TO vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ECHI.TO is traded in CAD, while UTES is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UTES values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECHI.TO achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 2.29% return.


ECHI.TO

1D
0.33%
1M
2.35%
YTD
14.81%
6M
15.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UTES

1D
1.74%
1M
1.12%
YTD
2.29%
6M
1.93%
1Y
11.96%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
18.70%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECHI.TO vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ECHI.TO
Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF
14.81%20.01%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
2.29%-0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ECHI.TO and UTES is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECHI.TO vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECHI.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECHI.TO vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECHI.TOUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

ECHI.TO vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECHI.TO vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECHI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum UTES drawdown of -29.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHI.TO and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECHI.TOUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-29.41%

+22.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-9.57%

+6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-5.70%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

Volatility

ECHI.TO vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECHI.TOUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

21.70%

-3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

21.51%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

21.15%

-3.29%

ECHI.TO vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECHI.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECHI.TO vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

ECHI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, more than UTES's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECHI.TO
Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF
11.08%5.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.49%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECHI.TO and UTES have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ECHI.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECHI.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.

ECHI.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for ECHI.TO and 0.49% for UTES.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECHI.TO and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer