PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO).

ECHI.TO and QQCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECHI.TO is an actively managed fund by Ninepoint. It was launched on Aug 22, 2025. QQCC.TO is managed by Global X. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011.

Performance

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
ECHI.TO
Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF		10.27%20.01%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		-1.53%6.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECHI.TO achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than QQCC.TO's -1.53% return.

ECHI.TO

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
10.27%
6M
22.42%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

QQCC.TO

1D
1.06%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
-1.53%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with ECHI.TO:
ECHI.TO vs. HHIC.TOECHI.TO vs. HDIV.TOECHI.TO vs. HBTE.NEOECHI.TO vs. CDAY.NEOECHI.TO vs. INTY.TOECHI.TO vs. ENCL.TOECHI.TO vs. JEPI.TO
Often compared with QQCC.TO:
QQCC.TO vs. QQCL.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQC.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQQIQQCC.TO vs. QQQQQCC.TO vs. NVDA.TOQQCC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQCC.TO vs. HXQ.TO

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECHI.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
ECHI.TO
Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF

Return for Risk

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ECHI.TO
QQCC.TO
QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ECHI.TOQQCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.86

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.76

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.54

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.20

-0.00

+3.20

Correlation

The correlation between ECHI.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ECHI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, less than QQCC.TO's 12.05% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECHI.TO
Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF		8.68%5.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		12.05%11.27%9.89%11.85%11.04%5.15%5.84%6.31%7.90%6.01%6.73%8.89%

Drawdowns

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECHI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -100.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHI.TO and QQCC.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ECHI.TOQQCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-100.13%

+93.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-13.73%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-22.24%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.70%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-100.00%

+98.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-99.78%

+98.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.15%

—

Volatility

ECHI.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ECHI.TOQQCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.91%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

10.73%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

20.40%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

17.55%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

17.31%

+1.22%