ECHI.TO vs. FLI.TO
ECHI.TO (Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF) and FLI.TO (CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units)) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ECHI.TO vs. FLI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECHI.TO achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than FLI.TO's 10.81% return.
ECHI.TO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 15.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLI.TO
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
ECHI.TO vs. FLI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ECHI.TO Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF | 14.81% | 20.01% |
FLI.TO CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) | 10.81% | 8.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECHI.TO and FLI.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECHI.TO vs. FLI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ECHI.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLI.TO
ECHI.TO vs. FLI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) (FLI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECHI.TO | FLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECHI.TO vs. FLI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECHI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum FLI.TO drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHI.TO and FLI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECHI.TO | FLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -56.31% | +49.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | 0.00% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -7.53% | +6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.24% | — |
Volatility
ECHI.TO vs. FLI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECHI.TO | FLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 13.97% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 18.60% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 23.64% | -5.78% |
Dividends
ECHI.TO vs. FLI.TO - Dividend Comparison
ECHI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, more than FLI.TO's 7.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECHI.TO Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF | 11.08% | 5.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLI.TO CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) | 7.06% | 6.63% | 6.36% | 7.23% | 7.43% | 6.52% | 11.67% | 6.18% | 7.23% | 5.05% | 5.68% | 5.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECHI.TO and FLI.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and CI Global Asset Management.
Find the right allocation for ECHI.TO and FLI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer