PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECHI.TO achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than CANY.TO's 11.24% return.


ECHI.TO

1D
0.33%
1M
3.37%
YTD
14.81%
6M
15.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CANY.TO

1D
1.03%
1M
4.55%
YTD
11.24%
6M
11.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ECHI.TO and CANY.TO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO) and Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECHI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum CANY.TO drawdown of -8.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHI.TO and CANY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECHI.TOCANY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-8.34%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.97%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-2.12%

+0.82%

Volatility

ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECHI.TOCANY.TODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

17.71%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

17.71%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

17.71%

+0.15%

ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECHI.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CANY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECHI.TO vs. CANY.TO - Dividend Comparison

ECHI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, less than CANY.TO's 13.95% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ECHI.TO and CANY.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ECHI.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECHI.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CANY.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for ECHI.TO and 0.40% for CANY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECHI.TO and CANY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer