PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Expat Croatia Crobex UCITS ETF (ECDC.DE) and Expat Slovakia SAX UCITS ETF (SK9A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECDC.DE achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than SK9A.DE's -5.23% return.


ECDC.DE

1D
0.30%
1M
1.71%
6M
12.74%
YTD
13.63%
1Y
18.24%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*

SK9A.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
4.26%
6M
-3.96%
YTD
-5.23%
1Y
-8.43%
3Y*
-8.81%
5Y*
-11.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ECDC.DE
Expat Croatia Crobex UCITS ETF
13.63%19.63%25.09%27.42%-21.40%16.97%-22.59%10.86%-9.33%
SK9A.DE
Expat Slovakia SAX UCITS ETF
-5.23%-7.70%-11.57%-2.72%-26.07%0.64%-6.13%-2.42%-10.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ECDC.DE and SK9A.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2018

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Expat Croatia Crobex UCITS ETF

Expat Slovakia SAX UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECDC.DE
ECDC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ECDC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECDC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECDC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ECDC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECDC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SK9A.DE
SK9A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SK9A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SK9A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SK9A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SK9A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SK9A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Expat Croatia Crobex UCITS ETF (ECDC.DE) and Expat Slovakia SAX UCITS ETF (SK9A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECDC.DESK9A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.84

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

-0.55

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

-1.04

+8.80

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECDC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the SK9A.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECDC.DE and SK9A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECDC.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum SK9A.DE drawdown of -73.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECDC.DE and SK9A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECDC.DESK9A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-73.30%

+37.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.52%

-15.32%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.02%

-31.08%

+20.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.39%

-49.50%

+21.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-71.32%

+71.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.89%

-45.90%

+32.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

8.06%

-5.71%

Volatility

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Expat Croatia Crobex UCITS ETF (ECDC.DE) is 2.36%, while Expat Slovakia SAX UCITS ETF (SK9A.DE) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that ECDC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SK9A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECDC.DESK9A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

5.90%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

7.80%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

10.02%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

9.51%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

38.29%

-24.73%

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ECDC.DE and SK9A.DE have an expense ratio of 1.38%.


Dividends

ECDC.DE vs. SK9A.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ECDC.DE nor SK9A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ECDC.DE and SK9A.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.38% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECDC.DE and SK9A.DE have the same expense ratio: 1.38% per year.

ECDC.DE tracks CROBEX Index, while SK9A.DE tracks SAX Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECDC.DE and SK9A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer