500U.L vs. GOOGL

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while GOOGL (Alphabet Inc. Class A) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, 500U.L returned 12.92%/yr vs 22.68%/yr for GOOGL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

500U.L vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 500U.L achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 7.93% return.

500U.L

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 7.30%
• 1Y: 21.60%
• 3Y*: 20.59%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: —

GOOGL

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: -13.18%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 6M: 7.76%
• 1Y: 94.97%
• 3Y*: 42.22%
• 5Y*: 22.68%
• 10Y*: 25.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

500U.L vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc	7.53%	17.42%	25.42%	26.85%	-18.63%	29.68%	17.93%	31.98%	-2.14%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A	7.93%	65.99%	36.01%	58.32%	-39.09%	65.30%	30.85%	28.18%	2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between 500U.L and GOOGL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2018	0.39

Return for Risk

500U.L vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

500U.L

500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

GOOGL

GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 95
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

500U.L vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	500U.L	GOOGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	3.22	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	4.43	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.54	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	4.69	-2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	15.57	-4.83

500U.L vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 500U.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 500U.L and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

500U.L vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 500U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum GOOGL drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500U.L and GOOGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	500U.L	GOOGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.04%	-65.29%	+31.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-20.37%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.29%	-29.81%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.22%	-44.32%	+20.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	-16.15%	+13.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-13.01%	+8.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	6.12%	-4.11%

Volatility

500U.L vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) is 3.99%, while Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that 500U.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	500U.L	GOOGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	9.30%	-5.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.25%	21.32%	-12.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.97%	29.65%	-17.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.88%	31.47%	-15.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	29.16%	-12.00%

Dividends

500U.L vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

500U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A	0.25%	0.27%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 500U.L and GOOGL in my portfolio?

500U.L and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.