PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EBNK.TO is traded in CAD, while HISU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HISU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBNK.TO achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly higher than HISU-U.TO's 2.33% return.


EBNK.TO

1D
-1.56%
1M
6.02%
YTD
5.02%
6M
9.74%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
34.22%
5Y*
10Y*

HISU-U.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
2.21%
YTD
2.33%
6M
0.87%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
5.02%60.13%28.78%20.83%15.71%
HISU-U.TO
Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund
2.33%-1.75%12.72%1.60%4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EBNK.TO and HISU-U.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBNK.TO
EBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

HISU-U.TO
HISU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HISU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBNK.TOHISU-U.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

0.90

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

1.25

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.02

+0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.97

2.66

+4.31

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the HISU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBNK.TO and HISU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBNK.TOHISU-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

0.90

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.85

+0.01

Drawdowns

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, which is greater than HISU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBNK.TO and HISU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBNK.TOHISU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-5.49%

-25.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-4.01%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.16%

-5.49%

-15.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.69%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-1.78%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

1.54%

+2.66%

Volatility

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) at 0.79%. This indicates that EBNK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HISU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBNK.TOHISU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

0.79%

+5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.02%

3.43%

+13.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.66%

4.58%

+17.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.92%

5.94%

+20.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.92%

5.94%

+20.98%

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBNK.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HISU-U.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBNK.TO vs. HISU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

EBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.02%, more than HISU-U.TO's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
11.02%11.05%12.56%7.32%7.52%
HISU-U.TO
Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund
2.74%2.93%3.70%3.85%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBNK.TO and HISU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HISU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HISU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EBNK.TO.

EBNK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HISU-U.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EBNK.TO and 0.15% for HISU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBNK.TO and HISU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer