EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EBNK.TO (Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD) and EMAX.TO (Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Evolve, while EMAX.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EBNK.TO returned 29.21% vs 48.14% for EMAX.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBNK.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMAX.TO.

Performance

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBNK.TO achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than EMAX.TO's 30.76% return.

EBNK.TO

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 9.74%
• 1Y: 29.21%
• 3Y*: 34.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMAX.TO

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 30.76%
• 6M: 24.14%
• 1Y: 48.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD	5.02%	60.13%	29.32%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	30.76%	4.63%	3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EBNK.TO and EMAX.TO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024	0.08

The correlation between EBNK.TO and EMAX.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EBNK.TO	EMAX.TO
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBNK.TO

EBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 38
EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

EMAX.TO

EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBNK.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.42	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.13	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.39	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	3.90	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.97	12.55	-5.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBNK.TO and EMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBNK.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	2.42	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.73	+0.13

Drawdowns

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, which is greater than EMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBNK.TO and EMAX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBNK.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.02%	-27.55%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.87%	-12.39%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	-3.72%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-9.31%	+1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.20%	3.85%	+0.35%

Volatility

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) is 6.37%, while Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that EBNK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBNK.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	7.47%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.02%	15.32%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.66%	20.03%	+1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.92%	22.41%	+4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.92%	22.41%	+4.51%

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBNK.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBNK.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

EBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.02%, more than EMAX.TO's 10.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD	11.02%	11.05%	12.56%	7.32%	7.52%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	10.25%	13.44%	12.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBNK.TO and EMAX.TO in my portfolio?

EBNK.TO and EMAX.TO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EBNK.TO or EMAX.TO?

On fees, EBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBNK.TO or EMAX.TO?

EBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMAX.TO.

What is the main difference between EBNK.TO and EMAX.TO?

EBNK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while EMAX.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EBNK.TO and 0.65% for EMAX.TO.