PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBNK.TO achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return.


EBNK.TO

1D
-1.56%
1M
6.02%
YTD
5.02%
6M
9.74%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
34.22%
5Y*
10Y*

CFOU.TO

1D
-1.41%
1M
9.71%
YTD
23.22%
6M
34.47%
1Y
88.95%
3Y*
57.23%
5Y*
28.45%
10Y*
22.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
5.02%60.13%28.78%20.83%-4.75%
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF
23.22%69.17%56.15%18.37%-29.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022

0.44

The correlation between EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EBNK.TO
CFOU.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

EBNK.TO
100.0%
CFOU.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Communication Services

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Energy

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Healthcare

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Industrials

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Real Estate

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Technology

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Utilities

EBNK.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBNK.TO
EBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CFOU.TO
CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBNK.TOCFOU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.57

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

5.56

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

22.74

-15.76

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBNK.TOCFOU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

3.62

-2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.33

+0.53

Drawdowns

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBNK.TOCFOU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-86.23%

+55.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-16.08%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.16%

-24.95%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-3.23%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-22.46%

+15.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

3.93%

+0.27%

Volatility

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) is 6.37%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that EBNK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBNK.TOCFOU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

8.18%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.02%

20.93%

-3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.66%

24.70%

-3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.92%

27.56%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.92%

33.85%

-6.93%

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBNK.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison

EBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.02%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
11.02%11.05%12.56%7.32%7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

EBNK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EBNK.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer