EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO
EBNK.TO (Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Evolve, while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. EBNK.TO is actively managed, while CFOU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EBNK.TO returned 34.22%/yr vs 57.23%/yr for CFOU.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBNK.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.
Performance
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBNK.TO achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return.
EBNK.TO
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- 34.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- 23.22%
- 6M
- 34.47%
- 1Y
- 88.95%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 28.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.91%
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD | 5.02% | 60.13% | 28.78% | 20.83% | -4.75% |
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 23.22% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -29.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022 | 0.44 |
The correlation between EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EBNK.TO
CFOU.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EBNK.TO
CFOU.TO
Basic Materials
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Communication Services
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Energy
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Healthcare
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Industrials
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Real Estate
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Technology
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Utilities
EBNK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EBNK.TO
CFOU.TO
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBNK.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.57 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 5.56 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 22.74 | -15.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBNK.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 3.62 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.33 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBNK.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.02% | -86.23% | +55.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.87% | -16.08% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -24.95% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -3.23% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -22.46% | +15.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 3.93% | +0.27% |
Volatility
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) is 6.37%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that EBNK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBNK.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 8.18% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.02% | 20.93% | -3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.66% | 24.70% | -3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 27.56% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 33.85% | -6.93% |
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBNK.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBNK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison
EBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.02%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD | 11.02% | 11.05% | 12.56% | 7.32% | 7.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
EBNK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EBNK.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
Find the right allocation for EBNK.TO and CFOU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer