PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBND vs. EMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EBND vs. EMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EBND vs. EMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than EMBX's -0.21% return.


EBND

1D
1.23%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-0.61%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*
1.42%

EMBX

1D
1.21%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBND vs. EMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EBND vs. EMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBND
EBND Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBND Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBND Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EMBX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBND vs. EMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBNDEMBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

EBND vs. EMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBNDEMBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.93

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between EBND and EMBX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EBND vs. EMBX - Dividend Comparison

EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than EMBX's 2.34% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
5.80%5.54%5.89%5.26%4.75%3.83%3.67%4.68%4.70%2.00%
EMBX
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
2.34%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EBND vs. EMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.51%, which is greater than EMBX's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and EMBX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EBNDEMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.51%

-5.14%

-24.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-4.00%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-0.77%

-10.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

Volatility

EBND vs. EMBX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EBNDEMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16%

6.01%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.90%

6.01%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.18%

6.01%

+3.17%