PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBND vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBND vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EBND has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 1.42%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


EBND

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.29%
6M
-0.48%
YTD
0.87%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
1.42%
ALL TIME*
1.04%

DBO

1D
1.56%
1M
24.59%
6M
53.46%
YTD
76.48%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.01M$10.23M$13.95M
$5.14M$5.71M$6.29M

EBND vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
0.87%15.83%-2.70%9.02%-11.84%-9.66%4.49%10.40%-6.52%13.93%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
76.48%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EBND and DBO is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011

0.21

The correlation between EBND and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.42 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBND vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EBND
EBND Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EBND vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EBNDDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

2.01

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

6.09

-3.47

EBND vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBND and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EBND vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.51%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBNDDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.51%

-90.18%

+60.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-27.73%

+21.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.31%

-28.20%

+20.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.12%

-37.68%

+11.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.50%

-61.69%

+32.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-53.56%

+51.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-62.20%

+51.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

9.96%

-7.70%

Volatility

EBND vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) is 1.78%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that EBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBNDDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

17.75%

-15.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.38%

33.77%

-27.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.11%

38.53%

-31.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.00%

33.35%

-24.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.08%

32.20%

-23.12%

EBND vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBND vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%
EBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
5.37%5.54%5.89%5.26%4.75%3.83%3.67%4.68%4.70%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBND and DBO have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to EBND (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBND dropped -29.51% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 12.59% vs 1.42% for EBND. On fees, EBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

EBND has the higher dividend yield at 5.37%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.

EBND is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. EBND tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EBND and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBND and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer