PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBNAX vs. DEDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBNAX vs. DEDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EBNAX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBNAX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than DEDIX's 1.26% return.


EBNAX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.38%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.78%
1Y
11.22%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*

DEDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.91%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
4.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBNAX vs. DEDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EBNAX
American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund
2.26%15.91%0.33%12.11%-14.03%-3.96%7.65%13.16%-4.67%13.57%
DEDIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund
1.26%9.51%7.90%8.72%-10.60%0.56%6.81%15.91%-4.69%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between EBNAX and DEDIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2016

0.64

The correlation between EBNAX and DEDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBNAX vs. DEDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBNAX
EBNAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EBNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EBNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DEDIX
DEDIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DEDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DEDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBNAX vs. DEDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EBNAX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBNAXDEDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

2.13

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.57

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

14.83

-5.99

EBNAX vs. DEDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the DEDIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBNAX and DEDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBNAXDEDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

4.12

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.90

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.15

-0.63

Drawdowns

EBNAX vs. DEDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBNAX drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, which is greater than DEDIX's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBNAX and DEDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBNAXDEDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

-20.06%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-2.46%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-3.25%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.72%

-20.06%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

0.00%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-3.40%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

0.59%

+0.68%

Volatility

EBNAX vs. DEDIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EBNAX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX) at 0.78%. This indicates that EBNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBNAXDEDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

0.78%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.04%

1.67%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.88%

2.13%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.74%

3.36%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

4.06%

+2.86%

EBNAX vs. DEDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than DEDIX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBNAX vs. DEDIX - Dividend Comparison

EBNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than DEDIX's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEDIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund
6.16%5.76%6.69%5.40%4.96%4.42%4.38%4.31%5.59%6.04%4.02%3.54%
EBNAX
American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund
5.93%6.12%7.26%5.45%5.39%4.85%4.89%6.09%5.90%6.59%1.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBNAX and DEDIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EBNAX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to DEDIX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBNAX dropped -26.27% vs DEDIX's -20.06%.

DEDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBNAX and DEDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer