EBIZ.L vs. URND.L
EBIZ.L (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and URND.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - EBIZ.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive E-commerce v2 Index, while URND.L is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EBIZ.L returned 14.98%/yr vs 27.93%/yr for URND.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBIZ.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for URND.L.
Performance
EBIZ.L vs. URND.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIZ.L achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than URND.L's -5.27% return.
EBIZ.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- 6M
- -12.15%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- -4.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URND.L
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -16.21%
- 6M
- -22.59%
- YTD
- -5.27%
- 1Y
- 9.07%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBIZ.L vs. URND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ.L Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -9.29% | 18.17% | 30.42% | 32.47% | 4.99% |
URND.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing | -5.27% | 58.56% | 3.00% | 32.59% | -5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIZ.L and URND.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIZ.L vs. URND.L — Risk / Return Rank
EBIZ.L
URND.L
EBIZ.L vs. URND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EBIZ.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing (URND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EBIZ.L | URND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 0.28 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 0.59 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EBIZ.L vs. URND.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIZ.L drawdown since its inception was -56.06%, which is greater than URND.L's maximum drawdown of -39.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ.L and URND.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIZ.L | URND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.06% | -39.03% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.87% | -32.00% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.87% | -39.03% | +12.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.87% | -31.31% | +14.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.43% | -11.55% | -15.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.11% | 15.44% | -0.33% |
Volatility
EBIZ.L vs. URND.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EBIZ.L) is 6.78%, while Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing (URND.L) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that EBIZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIZ.L | URND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 10.52% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.02% | 34.40% | -17.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.87% | 50.28% | -29.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 39.74% | -11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 39.74% | -11.06% |
EBIZ.L vs. URND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIZ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URND.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIZ.L vs. URND.L - Dividend Comparison
EBIZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ.L Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URND.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBIZ.L and URND.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EBIZ.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EBIZ.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URND.L.
EBIZ.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while URND.L is Uranium. EBIZ.L tracks Solactive E-commerce v2 Index, while URND.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ.L and 0.65% for URND.L.
Find the right allocation for EBIZ.L and URND.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer