PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EATVX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EATVX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EATVX achieves a 18.58% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EATVX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 11.56%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.34% annualized return.


EATVX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.17%
6M
15.66%
YTD
18.58%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
11.56%
ALL TIME*
8.67%

NASDX

1D
0.04%
1M
-5.75%
6M
14.76%
YTD
13.49%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
27.14%
5Y*
16.65%
10Y*
21.34%
ALL TIME*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EATVX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EATVX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund
18.58%12.86%14.37%9.44%-9.77%25.92%4.39%29.73%-5.98%17.65%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
13.49%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EATVX and NASDX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2000

0.72

The correlation between EATVX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EATVX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATVX
EATVX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EATVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EATVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EATVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EATVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EATVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATVX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EATVXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.23

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.09

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.88

7.39

+7.49

EATVX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EATVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EATVX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EATVX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EATVX drawdown since its inception was -53.01%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATVX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EATVXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.01%

-83.16%

+30.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-11.90%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-22.71%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.70%

-35.33%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.63%

-35.33%

-3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-6.50%

+4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-34.22%

+26.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

3.35%

-1.46%

Volatility

EATVX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) is 3.70%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that EATVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EATVXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

7.09%

-3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

15.39%

-5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

18.73%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

23.44%

-8.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

22.82%

-5.27%

EATVX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

EATVX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

EATVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than NASDX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EATVX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund
3.51%4.16%3.75%3.24%2.17%4.50%1.29%1.13%1.57%0.95%1.10%8.71%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
3.18%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


EATVX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to EATVX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EATVX dropped -53.01% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

EATVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EATVX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer