EATVX vs. FGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX).
EATVX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 27, 1999. FGINX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Oct 4, 1993.
Performance
EATVX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EATVX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATVX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund | 1.24% | 12.86% | 14.37% | 9.44% | -9.77% | 25.92% | 4.39% | 29.73% | -5.98% | 17.65% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 4.63% | 29.78% | 15.13% | 11.98% | 3.03% | 21.37% | -0.08% | 25.64% | -10.27% | 18.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EATVX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EATVX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 10.32%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.
EATVX
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
FGINX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EATVX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EATVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EATVX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank
EATVX
FGINX
EATVX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EATVX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.84 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 2.47 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.55 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 10.90 | -5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EATVX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.84 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 1.01 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.72 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between EATVX and FGINX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EATVX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison
EATVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than FGINX's 10.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATVX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund | 4.11% | 4.16% | 3.75% | 3.24% | 2.17% | 4.50% | 1.29% | 1.13% | 1.57% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 8.71% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 10.86% | 11.28% | 12.40% | 7.11% | 7.04% | 11.97% | 6.59% | 51.75% | 25.36% | 5.13% | 4.12% | 5.66% |
Drawdowns
EATVX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EATVX drawdown since its inception was -53.01%, roughly equal to the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATVX and FGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EATVX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.01% | -54.80% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -11.56% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.70% | -16.21% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.63% | -37.37% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -5.46% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -9.74% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.70% | +0.19% |
Volatility
EATVX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 4.24%. This indicates that EATVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EATVX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 4.24% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 9.01% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 16.22% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 14.88% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 17.04% | +0.48% |