PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EARRX vs. EGRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EARRX vs. EGRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EARRX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than EGRIX's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, EARRX has underperformed EGRIX with an annualized return of 3.66%, while EGRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.56% annualized return.


EARRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.52%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
3.66%

EGRIX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.67%
6M
8.14%
1Y
19.83%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EARRX vs. EGRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
1.58%5.46%5.39%5.95%-3.22%7.50%5.05%5.29%-0.49%1.81%
EGRIX
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund
6.67%20.36%9.50%8.37%-1.94%3.66%4.71%14.80%-8.34%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EARRX and EGRIX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.07

The correlation between EARRX and EGRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EARRX vs. EGRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EARRX
EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EGRIX
EGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EARRX vs. EGRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EARRXEGRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

5.60

-3.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.10

7.96

-3.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

2.51

-0.94

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

5.89

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.23

21.29

-3.06

EARRX vs. EGRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EARRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is lower than the EGRIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EARRX and EGRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EARRXEGRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

5.60

-3.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.32

2.16

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.35

1.66

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.33

-0.25

Drawdowns

EARRX vs. EGRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EARRX drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, smaller than the maximum EGRIX drawdown of -14.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EARRX and EGRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EARRXEGRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-14.17%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.79%

-3.37%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.18%

-3.37%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.39%

-10.18%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.27%

-14.17%

+3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.08%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-1.84%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.93%

-0.72%

Volatility

EARRX vs. EGRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) is 0.49%, while Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) has a volatility of 0.93%. This indicates that EARRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EARRXEGRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.93%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

3.20%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

3.54%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.77%

4.03%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.71%

3.97%

-1.26%

EARRX vs. EGRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EARRX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EGRIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EARRX vs. EGRIX - Dividend Comparison

EARRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than EGRIX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
3.82%4.36%3.83%4.24%4.82%3.32%2.02%2.46%2.67%1.90%2.00%1.73%
EGRIX
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund
6.24%6.65%6.00%3.40%4.82%4.89%5.82%4.15%0.06%3.22%1.78%6.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


EARRX and EGRIX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EGRIX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to EARRX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EARRX dropped -10.27% vs EGRIX's -14.17%.

EGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.60 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EARRX and EGRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer