PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EARRX vs. ACITX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EARRX vs. ACITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) and American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (ACITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EARRX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than ACITX's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EARRX has outperformed ACITX with an annualized return of 3.66%, while ACITX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.66% annualized return.


EARRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.52%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
3.66%

ACITX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.24%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EARRX vs. ACITX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
1.58%5.46%5.39%5.95%-3.22%7.50%5.05%5.29%-0.49%1.81%
ACITX
American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund
1.70%6.68%1.68%3.17%-12.37%6.38%10.28%7.85%-1.21%4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EARRX and ACITX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.62

The correlation between EARRX and ACITX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EARRX vs. ACITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EARRX
EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ACITX
ACITX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ACITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACITX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ACITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACITX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EARRX vs. ACITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) and American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (ACITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EARRXACITXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

1.57

+0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.10

2.41

+1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.29

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

2.47

+2.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.23

7.88

+10.36

EARRX vs. ACITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EARRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the ACITX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EARRX and ACITX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EARRXACITXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.57

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.32

0.15

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.35

0.49

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.76

+0.32

Drawdowns

EARRX vs. ACITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EARRX drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, smaller than the maximum ACITX drawdown of -15.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EARRX and ACITX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EARRXACITXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-15.50%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.79%

-2.05%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.18%

-5.08%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.39%

-15.50%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.27%

-15.50%

+5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.88%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-3.24%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.64%

-0.43%

Volatility

EARRX vs. ACITX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) is 0.49%, while American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (ACITX) has a volatility of 0.85%. This indicates that EARRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EARRXACITXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.85%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

2.20%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50%

3.24%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.77%

6.14%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.71%

5.50%

-2.79%

EARRX vs. ACITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EARRX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ACITX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

EARRX vs. ACITX - Dividend Comparison

EARRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than ACITX's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACITX
American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund
4.23%4.30%2.19%4.44%7.34%4.47%1.16%2.45%4.31%3.47%2.27%0.99%
EARRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A
3.82%4.36%3.83%4.24%4.82%3.32%2.02%2.46%2.67%1.90%2.00%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


EARRX and ACITX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACITX has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to EARRX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EARRX dropped -10.27% vs ACITX's -15.50%.

EARRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EARRX and ACITX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer