PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Active Global Fixed Income Fund (EARN.TO) and Evolve Future Leadership Fund (LEAD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EARN.TO achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly higher than LEAD.TO's -4.13% return.


EARN.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.44%
6M
-1.08%
YTD
-1.84%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.61%

LEAD.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
1.87%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-4.13%
1Y
-3.93%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$3.29KCA$5.70KCA$6.26K
CA$5.33KCA$6.18KCA$7.84K

EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income Fund
-1.84%4.52%6.66%7.74%-3.86%0.88%2.29%
LEAD.TO
Evolve Future Leadership Fund
-4.13%12.13%38.23%34.98%-34.79%14.98%7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EARN.TO and LEAD.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2020

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EARN.TO
EARN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
EARN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EARN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EARN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EARN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
EARN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

LEAD.TO
LEAD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LEAD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Active Global Fixed Income Fund (EARN.TO) and Evolve Future Leadership Fund (LEAD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EARN.TOLEAD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.99

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

-0.15

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

-0.33

+1.48

EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EARN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the LEAD.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EARN.TO and LEAD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EARN.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.52%, smaller than the maximum LEAD.TO drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EARN.TO and LEAD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EARN.TOLEAD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.52%

-39.80%

+24.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-22.65%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.81%

-22.65%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.96%

-39.80%

+31.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-9.30%

+7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-13.81%

+12.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

10.12%

-8.95%

Volatility

EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Active Global Fixed Income Fund (EARN.TO) is 0.69%, while Evolve Future Leadership Fund (LEAD.TO) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that EARN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEAD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EARN.TOLEAD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

5.40%

-4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

14.99%

-12.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

18.57%

-15.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.76%

21.80%

-18.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

21.02%

-16.36%

Dividends

EARN.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Dividend Comparison

EARN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than LEAD.TO's 11.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EARN.TO
Evolve Active Global Fixed Income Fund
3.88%3.61%3.51%3.14%3.28%3.05%2.99%2.68%0.27%
LEAD.TO
Evolve Future Leadership Fund
11.67%9.21%5.84%7.25%9.02%5.44%1.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EARN.TO and LEAD.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EARN.TO is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while LEAD.TO is Global Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EARN.TO and LEAD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer