EAPR vs. USOY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) and USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. EAPR is passively managed, while USOY is actively managed. Over the past year, EAPR returned 22.51% vs 55.52% for USOY. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. EAPR charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for USOY.

Performance

EAPR vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAPR achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 59.86% return.

EAPR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.71%
• 1Y: 22.51%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 5.35%
• 10Y*: —

USOY

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 59.86%
• 6M: 58.33%
• 1Y: 55.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAPR vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	11.89%	14.80%	1.09%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	59.86%	-7.93%	7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EAPR and USOY is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024	-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between EAPR and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

EAPR vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

USOY

USOY Risk / Return Rank: 56
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAPR vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAPR	USOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.13	1.83	+1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.38	2.25	+3.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	1.34	+0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.54	4.10	+3.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	43.49	7.91	+35.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAPR vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAPR and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAPR	USOY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.13	1.83	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.96	-0.41

Drawdowns

EAPR vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, roughly equal to the maximum USOY drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAPR and USOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAPR	USOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	-17.46%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-14.29%	+11.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.47%	+6.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-6.47%	+2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	7.42%	-6.90%

Volatility

EAPR vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) is 3.75%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that EAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAPR	USOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	11.94%	-8.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.25%	27.16%	-20.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.22%	30.46%	-23.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.09%	26.14%	-16.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.02%	26.14%	-16.12%

EAPR vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAPR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAPR vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

EAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	54.95%	104.32%	48.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAPR and USOY in my portfolio?

EAPR and USOY have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAPR or USOY?

USOY has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to EAPR (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAPR dropped -17.65% vs USOY's -17.46%.

Which ETF is better, EAPR or USOY?

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 55.52% vs 22.51% for EAPR. On fees, EAPR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, EAPR has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAPR or USOY?

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 55.52% return vs 22.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAPR or USOY?

EAPR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAPR or USOY?

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.95%, compared with 0.00% for EAPR.

What is the main difference between EAPR and USOY?

EAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EAPR and 1.22% for USOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.