PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EALDX vs. EISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EALDX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund (EALDX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALDX achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than EISMX's -1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EALDX has underperformed EISMX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while EISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.64% annualized return.


EALDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.41%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
1.95%

EISMX

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-2.21%
1Y
-4.49%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALDX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EALDX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund
1.21%7.76%3.48%2.40%-3.28%-0.50%2.54%1.48%2.01%1.57%
EISMX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund
-1.95%-5.66%17.64%14.01%-8.77%22.02%11.31%34.37%-5.55%24.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EALDX and EISMX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2002

-0.05

The correlation between EALDX and EISMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EALDX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALDX
EALDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EISMX
EISMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALDX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund (EALDX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EALDXEISMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

-0.24

+2.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.60

-0.24

+3.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.97

+0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

-0.25

+3.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.97

-0.48

+15.45

EALDX vs. EISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the EISMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALDX and EISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EALDXEISMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

-0.24

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.23

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.51

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.53

+0.49

Drawdowns

EALDX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALDX drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALDX and EISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EALDXEISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-45.32%

+39.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.50%

-14.66%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.58%

-19.39%

+15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.89%

-19.81%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.12%

-39.95%

+33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-12.84%

+12.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-5.83%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

7.44%

-7.08%

Volatility

EALDX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund (EALDX) is 1.03%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that EALDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EALDXEISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

3.90%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

11.10%

-9.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68%

15.31%

-12.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.25%

17.11%

-13.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.49%

18.86%

-16.37%

EALDX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALDX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

EALDX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison

EALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, less than EISMX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EALDX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund
5.43%5.52%5.52%4.70%2.69%1.50%2.01%2.72%2.61%2.29%2.17%3.07%
EISMX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund
6.55%6.43%7.26%2.78%10.37%10.49%9.80%6.52%7.20%3.30%3.58%6.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


EALDX and EISMX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EISMX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to EALDX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALDX dropped -6.12% vs EISMX's -45.32%.

EALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EALDX and EISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer