PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAIIX vs. HWDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAIIX vs. HWDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) and The Hartford World Bond Fund (HWDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAIIX achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly higher than HWDIX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, EAIIX has outperformed HWDIX with an annualized return of 2.77%, while HWDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return.


EAIIX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.66%
6M
2.47%
YTD
4.35%
1Y
9.28%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
2.77%
ALL TIME*
3.16%

HWDIX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.20%
6M
0.25%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
1.70%
ALL TIME*
2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EAIIX vs. HWDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAIIX
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund
4.35%13.67%-2.81%8.45%-11.29%-5.71%9.33%6.09%-2.67%10.58%
HWDIX
The Hartford World Bond Fund
0.65%4.05%2.13%4.23%-3.83%-0.96%1.79%3.96%4.05%2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EAIIX and HWDIX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2011

0.44

The correlation between EAIIX and HWDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAIIX vs. HWDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EAIIX
EAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HWDIX
HWDIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HWDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HWDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EAIIX vs. HWDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) and The Hartford World Bond Fund (HWDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAIIXHWDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.17

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

0.77

+3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.11

2.57

+12.54

EAIIX vs. HWDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAIIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the HWDIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAIIX and HWDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAIIX vs. HWDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAIIX drawdown since its inception was -25.32%, which is greater than HWDIX's maximum drawdown of -8.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAIIX and HWDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAIIXHWDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.32%

-8.33%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-2.87%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.35%

-3.12%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.13%

-8.10%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.32%

-8.33%

-16.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.74%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-1.23%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.86%

-0.21%

Volatility

EAIIX vs. HWDIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to The Hartford World Bond Fund (HWDIX) at 0.59%. This indicates that EAIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAIIXHWDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.59%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

2.42%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

2.74%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

3.04%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

2.64%

+2.85%

EAIIX vs. HWDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAIIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than HWDIX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAIIX vs. HWDIX - Dividend Comparison

EAIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, more than HWDIX's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAIIX
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund
8.79%7.44%4.80%4.42%4.54%5.37%6.13%5.69%4.70%4.43%5.53%5.89%
HWDIX
The Hartford World Bond Fund
4.44%4.45%2.93%3.12%0.22%1.71%0.82%3.06%4.31%0.01%0.28%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAIIX and HWDIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAIIX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to HWDIX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAIIX dropped -25.32% vs HWDIX's -8.33%.

EAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAIIX and HWDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer