EAIIX vs. CWBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EAIIX (Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund) and CWBFX (American Funds Capital World Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EAIIX returned 2.72%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for CWBFX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAIIX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CWBFX.

Performance

EAIIX vs. CWBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) and American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAIIX achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than CWBFX's -0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EAIIX has outperformed CWBFX with an annualized return of 2.72%, while CWBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.27% annualized return.

EAIIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 4.65%
• 1Y: 10.56%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

CWBFX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: -0.30%
• 1Y: 1.53%
• 3Y*: 2.85%
• 5Y*: -2.43%
• 10Y*: 0.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAIIX vs. CWBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund	3.75%	13.67%	-2.81%	8.45%	-11.29%	-5.71%	9.33%	6.09%	-2.67%	10.58%
CWBFX American Funds Capital World Bond Fund	-0.48%	7.78%	-3.25%	5.81%	-17.52%	-5.17%	9.91%	7.66%	-1.81%	7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EAIIX and CWBFX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2007	0.66

The correlation between EAIIX and CWBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EAIIX vs. CWBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAIIX

EAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
EAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

CWBFX

CWBFX Risk / Return Rank: 4
CWBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CWBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CWBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CWBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CWBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAIIX vs. CWBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) and American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAIIX	CWBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	0.25	+2.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.86	0.39	+4.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.05	+0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	0.29	+4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.63	0.80	+15.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAIIX vs. CWBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAIIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the CWBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAIIX and CWBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAIIX	CWBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	0.25	+2.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	-0.37	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.05	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.86	-0.30

Drawdowns

EAIIX vs. CWBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAIIX drawdown since its inception was -25.32%, smaller than the maximum CWBFX drawdown of -27.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAIIX and CWBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAIIX	CWBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.32%	-27.91%	+2.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.33%	-4.45%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.35%	-7.69%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.13%	-26.34%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.32%	-27.91%	+2.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-14.34%	+13.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-4.19%	-0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.62%	1.61%	-0.99%

Volatility

EAIIX vs. CWBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) is 0.88%, while American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX) has a volatility of 1.81%. This indicates that EAIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAIIX	CWBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	1.81%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.43%	3.77%	-1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.32%	5.16%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.55%	6.57%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.51%	5.65%	-0.14%

EAIIX vs. CWBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAIIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CWBFX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAIIX vs. CWBFX - Dividend Comparison

EAIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than CWBFX's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CWBFX American Funds Capital World Bond Fund	2.78%	2.68%	3.01%	2.47%	1.99%	2.63%	3.18%	2.26%	1.87%	1.80%	2.05%	0.58%
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund	8.75%	7.44%	4.80%	4.42%	4.54%	5.37%	6.13%	5.69%	4.70%	4.43%	5.53%	5.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAIIX and CWBFX in my portfolio?

EAIIX and CWBFX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAIIX or CWBFX?

CWBFX has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to EAIIX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAIIX dropped -25.32% vs CWBFX's -27.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.