EAEMX vs. LZEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX).
EAEMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jun 29, 2006. LZEMX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Jul 14, 1994.
Performance
EAEMX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EAEMX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund | 2.89% | 27.16% | 5.39% | 9.46% | -11.27% | 4.19% | 2.65% | 12.32% | -14.02% | 27.03% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 6.61% | 41.35% | 7.60% | 22.44% | -14.86% | 5.37% | -0.07% | 18.06% | -18.11% | 28.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAEMX achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, EAEMX has underperformed LZEMX with an annualized return of 6.23%, while LZEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.
EAEMX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.23%
LZEMX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.90%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAEMX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAEMX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EAEMX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank
EAEMX
LZEMX
EAEMX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAEMX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.95 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 3.72 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.57 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.86 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | 14.21 | -3.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAEMX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.95 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.78 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.58 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.39 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between EAEMX and LZEMX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EAEMX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison
EAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than LZEMX's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund | 2.75% | 2.83% | 3.00% | 2.71% | 4.40% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 2.48% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 1.52% | 1.68% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 1.92% | 2.05% | 3.11% | 3.76% | 5.92% | 4.89% | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
EAEMX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAEMX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, roughly equal to the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAEMX and LZEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAEMX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.70% | -60.08% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -10.42% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -30.55% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.16% | -44.08% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.20% | -9.04% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.58% | -16.71% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.89% | -0.30% |
Volatility
EAEMX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison
Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) have volatilities of 5.94% and 6.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EAEMX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 6.23% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 9.72% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 14.30% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.42% | 14.11% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 16.34% | -2.96% |