EAEMX vs. HLEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EAEMX (Parametric Emerging Markets Fund) and HLEMX (Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EAEMX charges 1.58%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for HLEMX.

Performance

EAEMX vs. HLEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) and Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund (HLEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EAEMX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 13.24%
• 6M: 14.53%
• 1Y: 31.84%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 7.00%
• 10Y*: 7.28%

HLEMX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAEMX vs. HLEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	13.24%	27.16%	5.39%	9.46%	-11.27%	4.19%	2.65%	12.32%	-14.02%	27.03%
HLEMX Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund	0.00%	26.25%	1.96%	6.77%	-27.69%	-3.43%	13.47%	25.81%	-18.72%	35.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EAEMX and HLEMX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2006	0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between EAEMX and HLEMX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

EAEMX vs. HLEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAEMX

EAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 76
EAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAEMX vs. HLEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) and Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund (HLEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAEMX	HLEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAEMX	HLEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EAEMX	HLEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.48%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EAEMX	HLEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.57%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.60%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.43%	—	—

EAEMX vs. HLEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAEMX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than HLEMX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAEMX vs. HLEMX - Dividend Comparison

EAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than HLEMX's 93.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	2.50%	2.83%	3.00%	2.71%	4.40%	1.64%	1.08%	2.48%	2.14%	2.31%	1.52%	1.68%
HLEMX Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund	93.52%	93.52%	16.56%	3.13%	8.75%	8.53%	0.32%	1.40%	0.89%	0.73%	0.60%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAEMX and HLEMX in my portfolio?

EAEMX and HLEMX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.