PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAEMX vs. BADEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAEMX vs. BADEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAEMX achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly lower than BADEX's 19.83% return.


EAEMX

1D
0.72%
1M
3.60%
YTD
13.24%
6M
14.53%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
7.28%

BADEX

1D
1.02%
1M
8.20%
YTD
19.83%
6M
21.70%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAEMX vs. BADEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAEMX
Parametric Emerging Markets Fund
13.24%27.16%5.39%9.46%-11.27%4.19%1.70%
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
19.83%13.95%10.15%11.67%-11.34%4.49%2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EAEMX and BADEX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2020

0.89

The correlation between EAEMX and BADEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAEMX vs. BADEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAEMX
EAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BADEX
BADEX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BADEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BADEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BADEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BADEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BADEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAEMX vs. BADEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAEMXBADEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.57

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.27

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

12.91

-0.90

EAEMX vs. BADEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the BADEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAEMX and BADEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAEMXBADEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.81

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.73

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.86

-0.56

Drawdowns

EAEMX vs. BADEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAEMX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, which is greater than BADEX's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAEMX and BADEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAEMXBADEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.70%

-21.86%

-40.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-8.89%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.74%

-10.29%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-21.86%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.48%

-5.63%

-7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.25%

+0.44%

Volatility

EAEMX vs. BADEX - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX) have volatilities of 4.04% and 4.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAEMXBADEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

4.19%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

8.96%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

10.37%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.60%

10.22%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

10.38%

+3.05%

EAEMX vs. BADEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAEMX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BADEX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAEMX vs. BADEX - Dividend Comparison

EAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than BADEX's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
6.27%7.52%2.27%1.92%2.43%7.54%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAEMX
Parametric Emerging Markets Fund
2.50%2.83%3.00%2.71%4.40%1.64%1.08%2.48%2.14%2.31%1.52%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAEMX and BADEX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BADEX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to EAEMX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAEMX dropped -62.70% vs BADEX's -21.86%.

BADEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAEMX and BADEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer