PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EADOX vs. GMOQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EADOX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EADOX achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than GMOQX's 8.73% return.


EADOX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.99%
YTD
6.62%
6M
8.08%
1Y
18.73%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
7.80%

GMOQX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.67%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.27%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EADOX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EADOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
6.62%16.93%14.52%11.13%-6.42%-0.21%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
8.73%22.45%12.60%17.76%-16.26%-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EADOX and GMOQX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.56

The correlation between EADOX and GMOQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EADOX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EADOX
EADOX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EADOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EADOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EADOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EADOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EADOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOQX
GMOQX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EADOX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EADOXGMOQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.63

5.17

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

8.93

9.24

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.65

2.28

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

7.21

-1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.32

31.30

-9.98

EADOX vs. GMOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EADOX Sharpe Ratio is 5.63, which is comparable to the GMOQX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EADOX and GMOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EADOXGMOQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63

5.17

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

0.74

+0.97

Drawdowns

EADOX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EADOX drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, smaller than the maximum GMOQX drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADOX and GMOQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EADOXGMOQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-31.41%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-3.82%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.61%

-9.02%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-9.71%

+7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.88%

+0.01%

Volatility

EADOX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) is 0.64%, while GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that EADOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EADOXGMOQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

1.49%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.99%

4.37%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37%

5.33%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.57%

10.88%

-6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

10.88%

-6.17%

EADOX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EADOX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

EADOX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison

EADOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%, more than GMOQX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EADOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
10.45%10.51%8.27%8.73%8.87%7.56%7.42%7.57%7.83%7.61%4.04%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
5.86%6.37%6.23%10.36%13.87%7.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EADOX and GMOQX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMOQX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to EADOX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EADOX dropped -19.15% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.

EADOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.63 vs 5.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EADOX and GMOQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer