PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EAD vs. FIQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EAD vs. FIQGX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026
Documentation

EAD (Emerging Markets Dividend Fund) and FIQGX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EAD returned 3.33%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for FIQGX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EAD charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FIQGX.

Performance

EAD vs. FIQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAD achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than FIQGX's 17.10% return.

EAD

1D
0.47%
1M
0.99%
6M
-0.73%
YTD
0.35%
1Y
-0.13%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
6.79%

FIQGX

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.81%
6M
13.26%
YTD
17.10%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAD vs. FIQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EAD
Emerging Markets Dividend Fund		0.35%8.05%15.86%11.94%-23.08%21.62%6.35%27.22%-5.46%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z		17.10%31.96%-3.54%20.94%-11.74%6.86%17.11%19.81%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EAD and FIQGX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Emerging Markets Dividend Fund

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z

Often compared with EAD:
EAD vs. ERCEAD vs. KFEAD vs. IFNEAD vs. CNWIXEAD vs. FGKPXEAD vs. FEDIXEAD vs. SIVLX
Often compared with FIQGX:
FIQGX vs. PZIEXFIQGX vs. JEMWXFIQGX vs. FEDAXFIQGX vs. CNWIXFIQGX vs. FAMKXFIQGX vs. FEDDXFIQGX vs. VEMAX

Return for Risk

EAD vs. FIQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EAD
EAD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
FIQGX
FIQGX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FIQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAD vs. FIQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EADFIQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.01
2.05

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.05
2.72

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.37

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

3.15

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

11.28

-11.34

EAD vs. FIQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAD Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the FIQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAD and FIQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAD vs. FIQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAD drawdown since its inception was -67.37%, which is greater than FIQGX's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAD and FIQGX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EADFIQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.37%

-38.41%

-28.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-9.55%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-17.26%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-27.36%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-4.34%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-6.85%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.66%

-0.40%

Volatility

EAD vs. FIQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD) is 1.99%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that EAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EADFIQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

6.58%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

12.67%

-5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

14.69%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

14.40%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.84%

-0.73%

EAD vs. FIQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAD has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FIQGX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAD vs. FIQGX - Dividend Comparison

EAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.98%, more than FIQGX's 4.16% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAD
Emerging Markets Dividend Fund		9.98%9.47%9.08%9.07%10.97%7.59%8.51%8.44%9.11%8.58%9.62%10.95%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z		4.16%4.87%4.07%2.20%1.86%12.04%0.71%1.22%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EAD and FIQGX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQGX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to EAD (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAD dropped -67.37% vs FIQGX's -38.41%.

FIQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAD and FIQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer