EACPX vs. LIVIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EACPX (Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund) and LIVIX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund) are both mutual funds - EACPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while LIVIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, EACPX returned 13.93%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for LIVIX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EACPX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LIVIX.

Performance

EACPX vs. LIVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EACPX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than LIVIX's 12.11% return. Over the past 10 years, EACPX has outperformed LIVIX with an annualized return of 13.93%, while LIVIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.95% annualized return.

EACPX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 3.62%
• 1Y: 14.48%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 13.93%

LIVIX

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 12.11%
• 6M: 12.81%
• 1Y: 28.50%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: 11.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EACPX vs. LIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund	3.76%	9.13%	21.92%	41.77%	-29.56%	18.48%	33.61%	31.91%	-0.04%	25.78%
LIVIX BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund	12.11%	21.57%	13.60%	21.62%	-18.38%	18.75%	14.99%	26.76%	-7.83%	21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EACPX and LIVIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011	0.88

The correlation between EACPX and LIVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EACPX vs. LIVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACPX

EACPX Risk / Return Rank: 13
EACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
EACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
EACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
EACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

LIVIX

LIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 62
LIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
LIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
LIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACPX vs. LIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EACPX	LIVIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	2.31	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	3.21	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.42	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	3.07	-2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.21	13.61	-10.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EACPX vs. LIVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EACPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the LIVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EACPX and LIVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EACPX	LIVIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	2.31	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.64	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.72	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.64	-0.25

Drawdowns

EACPX vs. LIVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EACPX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than LIVIX's maximum drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACPX and LIVIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EACPX	LIVIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.39%	-34.44%	-28.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.26%	-9.44%	-6.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.77%	-17.39%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.70%	-26.45%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.70%	-34.44%	+0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-0.87%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.76%	-4.52%	-8.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	2.13%	+2.55%

Volatility

EACPX vs. LIVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) is 3.48%, while BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that EACPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EACPX	LIVIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.93%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	10.09%	+0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	12.57%	+1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.46%	15.85%	+4.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.01%	16.72%	+4.29%

EACPX vs. LIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LIVIX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

EACPX vs. LIVIX - Dividend Comparison

EACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than LIVIX's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund	8.01%	8.31%	4.43%	0.00%	0.00%	3.17%	3.14%	2.22%	2.39%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%
LIVIX BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund	2.21%	2.48%	0.01%	2.04%	1.96%	2.04%	1.56%	2.95%	2.35%	2.27%	1.54%	2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EACPX and LIVIX in my portfolio?

EACPX and LIVIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EACPX or LIVIX?

LIVIX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to EACPX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EACPX dropped -63.39% vs LIVIX's -34.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.