PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EACPX vs. FOCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EACPX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EACPX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 28.33% return. Over the past 10 years, EACPX has underperformed FOCKX with an annualized return of 13.93%, while FOCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.80% annualized return.


EACPX

1D
-1.10%
1M
2.25%
YTD
3.76%
6M
3.62%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
13.93%

FOCKX

1D
0.53%
1M
9.68%
YTD
28.33%
6M
29.20%
1Y
61.84%
3Y*
35.16%
5Y*
19.37%
10Y*
22.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EACPX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EACPX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund
3.76%9.13%21.92%41.77%-29.56%18.48%33.61%31.91%-0.04%25.78%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
28.33%22.28%38.91%42.92%-32.07%25.06%46.83%39.36%-3.18%38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EACPX and FOCKX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.93

The correlation between EACPX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EACPX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACPX
EACPX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
EACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCKX
FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACPX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EACPXFOCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.59

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

5.63

-4.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

24.93

-21.72

EACPX vs. FOCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EACPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the FOCKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EACPX and FOCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EACPXFOCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

3.57

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.86

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

1.02

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.74

-0.35

Drawdowns

EACPX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EACPX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than FOCKX's maximum drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACPX and FOCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EACPXFOCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.39%

-53.33%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-11.28%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-24.83%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

-36.97%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.70%

-36.97%

+3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

0.00%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.76%

-8.38%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

2.54%

+2.14%

Volatility

EACPX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) is 3.48%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that EACPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EACPXFOCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

5.38%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

13.94%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

17.78%

-3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.46%

22.68%

-2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

22.45%

-1.44%

EACPX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCKX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

EACPX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison

EACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than FOCKX's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EACPX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund
8.01%8.31%4.43%0.00%0.00%3.17%3.14%2.22%2.39%0.24%0.00%0.00%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
5.89%7.56%16.42%0.09%3.97%11.34%6.18%7.49%7.81%4.85%3.25%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EACPX and FOCKX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCKX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to EACPX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EACPX dropped -63.39% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EACPX and FOCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer