EACPX vs. BDJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ).
EACPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000. BDJ is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2005.
Performance
EACPX vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EACPX vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund | -11.12% | 9.13% | 21.92% | 41.77% | -29.56% | 18.48% | 33.61% | 31.91% | -0.04% | 25.78% |
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund | -5.83% | 26.12% | 16.87% | -6.67% | 0.83% | 26.56% | -7.58% | 37.43% | -10.42% | 20.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EACPX achieves a -11.12% return, which is significantly lower than BDJ's -5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EACPX has outperformed BDJ with an annualized return of 12.51%, while BDJ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.
EACPX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- -11.12%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.51%
BDJ
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -8.69%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EACPX vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EACPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BDJ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EACPX vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank
EACPX
BDJ
EACPX vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EACPX | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 0.69 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 1.04 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.15 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.97 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | 3.62 | -2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EACPX | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.69 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.49 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.54 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.30 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EACPX and BDJ is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EACPX vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison
EACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, less than BDJ's 9.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund | 9.35% | 8.31% | 4.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.17% | 3.14% | 2.22% | 2.39% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund | 9.78% | 9.03% | 8.21% | 9.49% | 12.18% | 5.95% | 7.08% | 6.66% | 7.21% | 6.07% | 6.88% | 7.36% |
Drawdowns
EACPX vs. BDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EACPX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than BDJ's maximum drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACPX and BDJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EACPX | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.39% | -59.46% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -12.28% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.70% | -21.39% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.70% | -48.14% | +14.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.24% | -9.16% | -4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -8.99% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | 3.29% | +1.27% |
Volatility
EACPX vs. BDJ - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ) at 5.62%. This indicates that EACPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EACPX | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 5.62% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 9.50% | +1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.32% | 16.68% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 16.13% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 18.38% | +2.61% |