EAASX vs. EISMX
EAASX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A) and EISMX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds from Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, EAASX returned 9.78%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for EISMX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EAASX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EISMX.
Performance
EAASX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAASX achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than EISMX's -2.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EAASX having a 9.78% annualized return and EISMX not far ahead at 10.01%.
EAASX
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -3.70%
- 1Y
- -5.19%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
EISMX
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -2.06%
- 6M
- -3.58%
- 1Y
- -4.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
EAASX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | -2.18% | -5.90% | 17.89% | 13.72% | -8.98% | 21.66% | 11.03% | 34.03% | -5.79% | 24.40% |
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | -2.06% | -5.66% | 17.64% | 14.01% | -8.77% | 22.02% | 11.31% | 34.37% | -5.55% | 24.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAASX and EISMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012 | 1.00 |
The correlation between EAASX and EISMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAASX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank
EAASX
EISMX
EAASX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (EAASX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAASX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.37 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | -0.69 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAASX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAASX drawdown since its inception was -39.96%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAASX and EISMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAASX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.96% | -45.32% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -14.66% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.45% | -19.39% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.95% | -19.81% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.96% | -39.95% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.27% | -12.94% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -5.84% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.97% | 7.87% | +0.10% |
Volatility
EAASX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (EAASX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) have volatilities of 4.48% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAASX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 4.49% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 11.61% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 15.58% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 17.15% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 18.84% | +0.01% |
EAASX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAASX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAASX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison
EAASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than EISMX's 6.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | 7.92% | 7.75% | 8.22% | 3.08% | 12.28% | 12.19% | 11.17% | 7.09% | 8.01% | 3.64% | 3.93% | 7.29% |
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | 6.56% | 6.43% | 7.26% | 2.78% | 10.37% | 10.49% | 9.80% | 6.52% | 7.20% | 3.30% | 3.58% | 6.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, EAASX and EISMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EISMX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to EAASX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAASX dropped -39.96% vs EISMX's -45.32%.
EISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAASX and EISMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer