PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (E15H.DE) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (CBUL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, E15H.DE achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly higher than CBUL.DE's 0.78% return.


E15H.DE

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.14%
6M
3.29%
YTD
2.91%
1Y
2.34%
3Y*
2.00%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*

CBUL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.46%
6M
0.78%
YTD
0.78%
1Y
1.66%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
E15H.DE
Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.91%0.86%-0.10%5.42%-10.65%
CBUL.DE
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
0.78%3.87%3.10%2.21%-3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between E15H.DE and CBUL.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between E15H.DE and CBUL.DE has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

E15H.DE
E15H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
E15H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
E15H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
E15H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
E15H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
E15H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUL.DE
CBUL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CBUL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (E15H.DE) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (CBUL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


E15H.DECBUL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.05

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

2.99

+0.57

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current E15H.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the CBUL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of E15H.DE and CBUL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum E15H.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, which is greater than CBUL.DE's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for E15H.DE and CBUL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


E15H.DECBUL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-5.07%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

-1.58%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

-1.58%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.61%

-1.02%

-4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-1.81%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.56%

+0.09%

Volatility

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (E15H.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (CBUL.DE) at 0.74%. This indicates that E15H.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


E15H.DECBUL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.74%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

2.92%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

3.98%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

3.46%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.34%

3.46%

+2.88%

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

E15H.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

E15H.DE vs. CBUL.DE - Dividend Comparison

E15H.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than CBUL.DE's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CBUL.DE
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
5.91%5.98%6.93%5.21%0.33%0.00%0.00%
E15H.DE
Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.94%0.97%0.82%0.74%0.94%0.86%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


E15H.DE and CBUL.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, E15H.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

E15H.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for CBUL.DE.

E15H.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while CBUL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond 0-5 Years Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for E15H.DE and 0.12% for CBUL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for E15H.DE and CBUL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer