DYNF vs. USPX
DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DYNF is actively managed, while USPX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.71%/yr vs 11.89%/yr for USPX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
DYNF vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 7.94% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.19%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
USPX
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
DYNF vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 10.04% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 13.47% | 14.75% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 7.94% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 9.72% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and USPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DYNF and USPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DYNF vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DYNF
USPX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
DYNF
USPX
Financial Services
DYNF
USPX
Communication Services
DYNF
USPX
Industrials
DYNF
USPX
Consumer Cyclical
DYNF
USPX
Healthcare
DYNF
USPX
Energy
DYNF
USPX
Utilities
DYNF
USPX
Real Estate
DYNF
USPX
Consumer Defensive
DYNF
USPX
Basic Materials
DYNF
USPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
USPX
DYNF vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DYNF | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 2.55 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.86 | 11.19 | +3.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than USPX's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -31.21% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -9.15% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -19.21% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -24.60% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -3.17% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -4.43% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.08% | -0.23% |
Volatility
DYNF vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) at 4.89%. This indicates that DYNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.89% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 10.06% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.24% | 12.74% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 16.28% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 15.96% | +3.95% |
DYNF vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DYNF vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than USPX's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 0.81% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 0.83% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DYNF and USPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DYNF has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to USPX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs USPX's -31.21%.
On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.71% vs 11.89% for USPX. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, USPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.
USPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.81% for DYNF.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.03% for USPX.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer