DYNF vs. IGM

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. DYNF is actively managed, while IGM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 15.35%/yr vs 20.96%/yr for IGM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.

Performance

DYNF vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 27.92% return.

DYNF

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: 2.71%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 12.86%
• 1Y: 31.46%
• 3Y*: 25.36%
• 5Y*: 15.35%
• 10Y*: —

IGM

• 1D: 3.64%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 27.92%
• 6M: 29.29%
• 1Y: 56.16%
• 3Y*: 36.48%
• 5Y*: 20.96%
• 10Y*: 25.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNF vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	12.25%	20.00%	30.29%	36.25%	-20.27%	22.12%	13.47%	14.75%
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	27.92%	26.76%	36.99%	60.68%	-35.83%	25.72%	45.11%	18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNF and IGM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.89

The correlation between DYNF and IGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DYNF vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DYNF	IGM
Technology	40.1%	85.2%
Financial Services	14.9%	0.3%
Communication Services	10.7%	13.9%
Industrials	8.4%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	0.0%
Healthcare	6.1%	-
Energy	5.0%	0.2%
Utilities	2.8%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	-
Basic Materials	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

DYNF vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 82
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

IGM

IGM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNF vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DYNF	IGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.54	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.13	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.42	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	3.43	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.10	11.62	+5.47

DYNF vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYNF Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYNF and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DYNF vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and IGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYNF	IGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-65.59%	+30.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-16.44%	+7.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.70%	-26.39%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.65%	-40.68%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.41%	+3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-15.22%	+9.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	4.85%	-3.00%

Volatility

DYNF vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) is 5.25%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that DYNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYNF	IGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	10.54%	-5.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.57%	18.42%	-7.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.14%	22.24%	-9.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	25.97%	-8.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.92%	24.70%	-4.78%

DYNF vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYNF vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than IGM's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	1.06%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	0.17%	0.17%	0.22%	0.33%	0.66%	0.16%	0.32%	0.50%	0.57%	0.57%	0.90%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYNF and IGM in my portfolio?

DYNF and IGM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYNF or IGM?

IGM has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to DYNF (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs IGM's -65.59%.

Which ETF is better, DYNF or IGM?

On 5-year performance, IGM leads with 20.96% vs 15.35% for DYNF. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYNF or IGM?

Over the 5-year period, IGM has performed better with a 20.96% return vs 15.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYNF or IGM?

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYNF or IGM?

DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.17% for IGM.

What is the main difference between DYNF and IGM?

DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.39% for IGM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.