PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYNF vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYNF vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.


DYNF

1D
0.79%
1M
0.48%
6M
10.16%
YTD
11.42%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.14%

BITI

1D
3.01%
1M
-2.58%
6M
22.77%
YTD
27.11%
1Y
58.64%
3Y*
-31.77%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.10M$26.49M$38.71M
$128.49M$134.27M$165.92M

DYNF vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
11.42%20.00%30.29%36.25%4.70%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
27.11%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNF and BITI is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.37

The correlation between DYNF and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (1 year) to -0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYNF vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DYNF vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DYNFBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.53

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

6.17

+5.18

DYNF vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYNF Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYNF and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DYNF vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYNFBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.72%

-92.16%

+57.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-25.28%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-84.63%

+65.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-86.12%

+85.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-68.59%

+62.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

10.35%

-8.45%

Volatility

DYNF vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) is 4.03%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that DYNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYNFBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

9.13%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

33.31%

-22.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

44.23%

-30.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

52.03%

-34.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.84%

52.03%

-32.19%

DYNF vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DYNF vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than BITI's 15.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.17%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
0.80%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYNF and BITI have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to DYNF (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, DYNF leads with 22.89% vs -31.77% for BITI. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 22.89% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 0.80% for DYNF.

DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 1.03% for BITI.

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYNF and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer